
HOUSTON, Texas -- Dynegy will pull out of a joint venture that planned to build several new coal-fired power plants due to credit and regulatory concerns.

OAKLAND, Calif. -- The 10 states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, plus Pennsylvania, will follow in California's footsteps to develop the standard to reduce transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions.

DENVER, Colo. -- Xcel Energy, Colorado's largest utility company, has mapped out an ambitious energy efficiency plan for 2009 that the firm says would save an amount of power equivalent to that generated by a new unit at a coal-fired plant.

The EAB ruled today that the EPA had no valid reason for refusing to limit carbon dioxide emissions from new coal-fired power plants. The decision means that all new and proposed coal plants nationwide must go back and address their carbon dioxide emissions. This puts an effective hold on the final permitting of almost all new coal plants until the Obama administration decides on the best available control technology for CO2 emissions from coal plants.Over at the politics blog Daily Kos, user WattHead has a somewhat more detailed analysis of the ruling, looking ahead to what the decision will mean for the Obama administration. The Associated Press also has a short article on the ruling, and includes a quote from a lawyer for energy companies that are seeking permits from the EPA as saying that today's news represents "a punt to the Obama administration."
See GreenBiz.com
China
Coal continues to literally pull millions out of poverty in China, and India is next. CCTs can be exported to these nations. We have a responsibility to produce electricity in a environmentally responsible way, but we need to remember the UN's Development Goals. Coal is helping China reach those goals in an amzaing way. CCTs must be furthered developed.
Jude C
The scientific reasons why “global warming is not a global cris
Conclusion of Lord Monckton’s address to the Cambridge Union Society
8 October 2007
AL GORE says, “I believe this is a moral issue.” So it is. To “announce disasters” or “scary scenarios” or “over-represent factual presentations” in place of adherence to the scientific truth – that is a moral issue.
To let politicians insert data into official scientific documents; to alter those documents so as to contradict scientific findings; to manipulate decimal points so as to engender false headlines by exaggerating tenfold – those are moral issues.
To exaggerate by 2000% not only the atmospheric lifetime of a trace gas but also the effect of that gas on temperature; to reduce the magnitude of its predicted influence on temperature without reducing the predicted temperature itself – those are moral issues.
To claim scientific unanimity where none exists; to assert that catastrophe is likely when most scientists do not; to exalt theoretical computer models over real-world observations; to misstate the conclusions of scientific papers or the meaning of observed data; to overstate the likely future course of climatic phenomena by several orders of magnitude – those are moral issues.
To reverse the sequence of events in the early climate; to repeat that reversal in a propaganda book intended to infect the minds of children; to persist in false denial that past temperatures exceeded today’s; to state that climate events that have not occurred have occurred; to ascribe these non-events as well as specific extreme-weather events unjustifiably to humankind – those are moral issues.
To propose solutions to the non-problem of climate change that would cost many times more than the problem itself, if there were one; to advocate measures to mitigate fancifully-imagined future climatic changes when adaptation would cost far less and achieve far more; to ignore the real problems of resource depletion, energy security, bad Third World government and fatal diseases that kill millions – those are moral issues.
To advance policies congenial to the narrow, short-term political or financial vested interest of some mere corporation or faction at the expense of the wider, long-term general interest of us all – those are moral issues.
Above all, to inflict upon the nations of the world a policy of ever-grimmer energy starvation calculated not merely to inconvenience the prosperous but to condemn the very poorest to remain imprisoned in poverty forever, and to die in their tens of millions for want of the light and heat and power which we have long been fortunate enough to take for granted – that is a moral issue.
Sir, this House is the House of youth. Here high ideals are shaped and sharpened. Here of all places, it is surely understood that in each of us, however far apart in mere distance or origin or wealth or achievement, there is the image and likeness of our Creator; that by this intimate communion with our Maker each of us, however poor, is of unique and precious value; that therefore there is only one race, the human race; that the suffering children of Africa, of Asia and of south America, imploring us with their hopeless, hopeful eyes, are our people. They cannot look to their own. They look to us. We must get the science right or we shall get the policy wrong. We have failed them and failed them before.
We must not fail them again!
While this is good news,
While this is good news, it's not a clear victory for cleaner air yet.
Let's not forget that coal is not a renewable resource. Just like oil, we are going to run out some day.
And let's not let ourselves be greenwashed — there's no such thing as "clean" coal. Just mining coal from the ground causes extreme environmental impacts and pollution, and that's before we start burning it off.
There's not even such a thing as "cleaner" coal yet. Politicians and energy companies can talk all they want about their "support" for cleaner coal. None of those companies have actually employed any new technology to try to make their power plants "cleaner."
Jude C
The EIA, the IEA, the DOE, and all the other important energy organizations in the world do believe in clean coal. Carbon capture and storage is set to become a reality. These are not companies and politicians saying these things - these are expert energy organizations around the world. The IEA has a "Clean Coal Centre." Spreading untruths is not going to get us anywhere. Coal is a vital part of our future, as Obama has stated.
Post new comment